Table of contents
When you look upon the front end of your lens barrel, you'll see a ratio number (1:2.8, 1:2.8-4, 1:3.5-5.6, etc), which is the maximum aperture of the lens.
A lens with a low f-number (wide maximum aperture), is a better quality lens and allows you to do more with it.
High quality zoom lenses deliver a constant f-stop throughout the focal range (i.e. a f/2.8 at 35mm and a f/2.8 at 80mm); whereas on a lower quality lens, the f-stop varies as you travel up the focal range (i.e. a f/3.5 at 28mm, but a f/5.6 at 80mm).
It is to be noted that any lens that is f/2.8 or lower is considered to be a professional lens, and will have a correspondingly higher price tag.
Or Filter size. Almost all lenses have a threaded section on the front that allows you to screw on filters to achieve certain effects. When referring to a len' specifications, it should tell you the diameter of the filter thread and then you can purchase your filters in the same diameter. Common thread sizes include 49mm, 52mm, 55mm, 58mm, 62mm, 67mm, 72mm, 77mm and 82mm.
The standard lens has a fixed focal length (50mm, 85mm, 100mm), and reproduces fairly accurately what the human eye sees -- in terms of perspective and angle of view.
For a 35mm film camera or a full-frame DSLR, the 50mm lens is considered standard.
At higher focal lengths (85mm or 100mm) you have an ideal lens for portraiture because when coupled with a wide aperture they thoroughly soften any background detail, thus making it less likely to distract from the main subject.
A wide-angle has a shorter focal length (10 thru 42mm) when compared to a standard lens.
This enables you to capture a comparatively wider angle of view. A wide-angle lens is a natural choice for capturing outdoor landscapes and group portraits.
You can use wide-angle lenses to capture a deep DoF (Depth of Focus, the opposite of the "distraction from the main subject").
Telephoto lenses (100mm -- 800mm) can provide you with a narrow field of view.
These long lenses enable you to compress a distance (and compress the sense of depth, as well) and pick out specific objects from far off.
They have a strong resolving power and an inherent shallow DoF, where the slightest lateral moment can take a subject out of view.
Macro lenses are used for close-up or "macro" photography (ie., designed for short focus distances).
They range in focal lengths of between 50-200mm. These lenses obtain razor-sharp focus for subjects within the macro focus distance, but lose their ability for sharp focus at other distances.
These lenses enable the photographer to obtain life-size or larger images of subjects like wasps, butterflies, and flowers.
Zoom lenses have variable focal lengths, and are extremely useful.
Some can range between a wide-angle and a telephoto (i.e. 24 to 300mm) so you have extensive versatility for composition.
The trade-off with zoom lenses is the aperture. Because of the number of elements required in constructing these lenses, they have a limited ability to open up and allow in light.
So unless you're prepared to outlay a lot of money, you will give up lens speed.
These lenses contain small gyro stabilizer sensors and servo-actuated lens elements, which purportedly correct for camera shake that occurs with longer focal length lens or in low-light conditions when you need to have slower shutter speeds to achieve an effective EV.
It is claimed that these lenses enable the user to shoot hand-held at 2 to 4 stop slower shutter speeds (exposure 4 to 16 times longer) than the minimum required for a sharp image (ie., exposure of 1/25 sec or longer).
They work as macro (zoom) lenses, allowing standard lenses to reduce their minimum focus distance. However, the lens loses the ability to focus at infinity.
Look through the viewfinder of any DSLR camera and you will see several dots, or squares, that represent individual points at which the camera is capable of focusing. The purpose of these focusing points may seem fairly obvious, but not all of them are created equal. When you press the shutter button (or back button) halfway, some of these points will light up, indicating that everything at that specific spot is crystal clear and your photo will be nice and sharp.
However, the speed at which your camera can focus on one of the points, as well as how accurate the focus will be, depends greatly on whether the individual focusing point is a single or cross-type. Understanding the differences in how they operate can help you decide which ones to use to take better photos.
Most DSLR cameras use whats's called a phase-detection focusing system -- whereas most mirrorless cameras, point-and-shoots, and mobile phones use a separate system called contrast-detect. In a DSLR, most of the light coming through the lens is reflected upwards by the mirror, to the optical viewfinder, which lets you see precisely what the camera lens sees.
However, a tiny bit of light is also sent downward to a series of sensors that are capable of figuring out whether the image is in focus. The science behind this involves splitting the incoming light, and comparing two beams, to essentially see if they match up. If not, an electronic signal is sent to the focusing motor, to adjust the lens until the image is in focus. All this happens in a fraction of a second, but these fractions matter in photography, and can often be the difference between a tack-sharp image and a blurry shot.
The problem with traditional phase-detecting systems is they get a bit stumped if there are a lot of vertical lines in the spot where they are trying to focus. To see how this works for yourself, print a sheet of paper on your computer, with nothing but vertical lines. Tape it to a wall, and try to focus on it with your camera. If you are using one of the focusing points on the outside edge of your camera's viewfinder, your lens will likely spend a few seconds hunting for focus but will probably never find it. However if you turn the paper sideways and try again your camera will likely get things focused fairly easily. This is because when light is sent to the phase-detection sensors in your camera, the sensors don't have enough information to determine focus, if all it sees is vertical lines.
While most of the time when you are out taking pictures, you are probably not shooting images of vertically-lined paper, this example does illustrate how your camera's autofocus can get slowed down, and become unreliable under certain conditions. Ironically, in this test, your camera will find focus much better if you use the live view function. That employs a contrast-detection focusing method which is also used in most mirrorless cameras, and while it is a bit slower, can have some advantages over traditional phase-detect systems.
Test your camera's focus sensors with nothing but a lined piece of paper.
To address this issue, most camera manufacturers have implemented cross-type focusing sensors that work fine when focusing on images with horizontal and vertical patterns. On high-end models (like the Nikon D5 or Canon 5D Mark III) there are several clusters of cross-type focusing sensors, but lower-end models (like the Nikon D3200 and Canon Rebel T3i) usually have just one, right in the center. This means that the center autofocus point will likely be significantly faster, and more reliable, than the points on the edge. You can see the results yourself by repeating the test from earlier with the center focus point, instead of one on the perimeter of your viewfinder.
The real-world implications of this are quite significant, and may very well change how you approach your photography. Many people use an automatic setting that allows their camera to look at all the available focus points, and determine which one should be used to set the focus. But, if you know that the the cross-type points will give you consistently better results, you might try using them more often.
This is especially useful with sports and fast action, but other types of photography situations can benefit from utilizing cross-type points also. Portrait, family, and wedding photographers often utilize the focus-and-recompose method to nail focus with a cross-type sensor, then shift their camera's field of view to get precisely the composition they want. If you shoot landscapes you might not need speedy autofocus, but using your camera's cross-type sensors may help your focus be more accurate.
Of course all this doesn't mean that the normal focusing sensors on your camera are worthless, just that knowing which ones are cross-type can often give you an advantage you might not have otherwise had.
One other point worth noting is that mirrorless cameras use phase-detection focusing more than they used to, and some are implementing cross-type sensors too. Just because this technology started with DSLRs does not mean it will be forever limited to these types of cameras, and as manufacturers continue to innovate we will likely see more, and better, focusing options in the years ahead.
Accordingly to Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirrorless_interchangeable-lens_camera (Jan 08th, 2019): "Compared to DSLR cameras, mirrorless cameras are mechanically simpler and are often smaller, lighter, and quieter (since their electronic shutter is used) due to the elimination of the moving mirror and mechanical shutter -- additionally, the lack of a moving mirror reduces vibration that can result in blurred images in super telephoto lenses when using a slow shutter speed.
"Until recently [2017-2018], mirrorless cameras were somewhat challenged to provide an electronic viewfinder with the clarity low-time-lag responsiveness of the optical viewfinders used on DSLRs (under strong sunlight or when photographing the sky at night). The fact that the image from the lens is always projected onto the image sensor allows for features that are only available in DSLRs when their mirror is locked up into 'live view' mode. This includes the ability to show a focus-peaking display, zebra patterning, and face or eye tracking. Moreover, the electronic viewfinder can provide live depth of field preview, can show a poorly-illuminated subject how it would look with correct exposure in real time, and is easier to view the results of an exposure in bright sunlight.
"With the latest phase-detect autofocus available on some mirrorless cameras, autofocus speed and accuracy (in some models) has been shown to be as good as DSLRs. But compared with DSLRs, MILCs have lower battery lifetime and smaller buffers (to save battery). On-sensor auto-focus is free of the adjustment requirements of the indirect focusing system of the DSLR, and the latest MILCs can shoot with phase-detect autofocus at up to 20 frames per second using up to 693 focus points—a number exceeding what is available on any DSLR. Using manual focus with an electronic viewfinder can be assisted by the ability to magnify the subject."
(1)/(o) + (1)/(i) = (1)/(f)
f-number is usually calculated by the f-stop definition N = 2i ⁄ 2 , where i = 1, 2, 3,... for f/1.4, f/2, f/2.8,...
Hyperfocal distance: H = (f2)/(Nc) + f
Near distance of acceptable sharpness: Dn = (s(H − f))/(H + s − 2f)
Far distance of acceptable sharpness: Df = (s(H − f))/(H − s)
EV = log2(N2)/(t) = ES
f-stop units i follows N = 2i ⁄ 2. Here there is a factor 0.5x with the unit because the flux goes with the square of the aperture diameter.
ISO units j follows: M = 50*2j
So, in principle, for a constant illumatation of the scenery, the sum combination of i, j and k units produces the same image lighting results.
Some random cameras and selected features.
When dinosaurs walked the Earth, lenses were totally manual. Not just in terms of focusing, but also in terms of exposure metering. There is no auto-focus, and there are no "auto", "aperture priority", "shutter priority" or "program" modes.
It was not until 1977 that Nikon had a huge advancement with "Automatic Maximum Aperture Indexing… or just "Auto Indexing (AI)" for short. The AI system itself, in layman terms, made the lens "smarter" and allowed cameras to have those "auto exposures" mode. The AI system had many upgrades over the years.
While later Nikkor lenses no longer have "AI" decorated on them, the AI technology is present in all of them "by default" in a way.
In 1986, Nikon had the "next big thing" with their lens. That is, auto-focusing.
The one thing you need to note about Nikon lens is the integrated focus motor. Yep, some Nikon lenses have auto-focus but do not have its own motor; You need a Nikon camera with a built-in motor… or that lens is as good as a manual focus lens. Now for a few more note-worthy things in regards to auto-focus (and the related terms).
AF and AF-S lenses are further categorized... or rather, they have evolved over the years.
From the 1930s to 1950s Nikon made lenses for the Leica Screw Mount (LTM) -- But Nikon themselves did not produce any LTM cameras. In 1959, Nikon came up with their own "F-mount" standard, and it has not changed since.
But please note that not all camera bodies and lenses are backward compatible -- mounting some older F-mount lenses on a later camera body may even result in damage. So please do your research before you slap an old lens on. Also, lens built for the Nikon mirrorless systems are different and will not mount on "F-mount" systems. See "CX" below.
Pentax probably has 2 prominent mount systems now.
Welcome to memory lane. This is a list of lens designations for the K-Mount lens.
https://photographylife.com/nikon-35mm-f1-8g-vs-50mm-f1-4g
So, which one of these lenses do I recommend? If you use a full-frame camera or primarily shoot portraits and need to get one of the best portrait lenses for under $500, I would certainly recommend the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G. For everything else, including day-to-day photography, I would say the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G is a better choice for DX cameras. Not only due to its focal length, but also its comparably good performance in terms of sharpness and bokeh. When it comes to focal lengths, while the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G is perfect on a full-frame FX camera, it certainly feels a little “too long” on a DX camera. Its narrower field of view on cropped sensors is quite limiting in terms of what you can fit into the frame, whereas the 35mm feels just perfect. We have used the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G for food, portrait and even landscape photography and I really liked working with this focal length.
Why didn't I compare the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G with the older and cheaper Nikon 50mm f/1.8D? Because the latter does not autofocus on cheaper Nikon bodies like D5000.
https://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Camera-Lenses/AF-S-NIKKOR-50mm-f%252F1.8G.html
Minimum focus distance is 0.45m. Cap/filter size is 58mm.
https://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/af-s-dx-nikkor-35mm-f%252f1.8g.html
Minimum focus distance is 0.3m. Cap/filter size is 52mm.
https://photographylife.com/lenses/nikon-af-s-dx-nikkor-35mm-f1-8g
Minimum focus distance is 1.1m. Cap/filter size is 58mm.
For full frame, Nikon has AF-P Nikkor 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR. The full-frame version is slightly brighter, but also bigger, heavier and more than twice as expensive.
https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-70-300mm-dx-vr-af-p
Minimum focus distance is 0.25m. Cap/filter size is 55mm.
https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-18-55mm-dx-vr-af-p
Minimum Focus Distance is 0.45m. Cap/filter size is 67mm.
https://photographylife.com/lenses/nikon-af-s-dx-nikkor-18-140mm-f3-5-5-6g-ed-vr
DX has a smaller sensor. If you put a FX lens on a DX camera, with the smaller sensor that produces a 1.5 crop factor, your 35mm lens now works like a 52.5mm lens (35mm x 1.5 crop factor).
If you buy a FX lens with a given focal length, what is its DX equivalent focal length? If your are using a DX camera, the EFL of DX and FX lenses is the same. However, the DX generated image has an factor with respect to the 35mm (full-FX).
This table gives images with same FoV. FX is in terms of a 35mm sensor.
DX cam | FX cam |
---|---|
DX lens | FX lens |
16 | 24 |
18 | 27 |
20 | 30 |
24 | 36 |
33 | 50 |
35 | 53 |
40 | 60 |
50 | 75 |
55 | 83 |
70 | 105 |
85 | 128 |
300 | 450 |
My acquisition date: ~2002-Sep
My rate: 8.0/10.
My comments: My first digital camera. Canon quality to start learning photography.
My acquisition date: ~2012-Mar
My rate: 5.0/10.
My comments: a very complete camera. Good optics. However, the detector quality is horrible. It is impossible to take sharp images, specially with ISO above 800. The manual focus also has problems. It is very hard to do something very simple, that is to focus at infinity. Video auto-zoom is very unstable. Decent batteries (4xAA) consumption (350+ frames).
My acquisition date: 2019-Jan
My rate: 9.0/10.
My comments: The camera specs created a very high expectation. In particular, multiple exposure and time-lapse control are great resources. All camera options are not so easy to handle. To be fast requires practice.
Announcement Date: 2014-Feb-12
Pixels: 24.0 MP
Sensor: CMOS APS-C DX (Nikon)
Viewfinder: Optical (pentamirror)
Sensitivity: ISO 100 - 25600* (nominal value of 12800)
Screen: fully articulated (able for selfies)
Focus Points: 39
Other features: GPS, time-lapse control and WiFi image sharing system
Max shutter speed: 1/4000 sec
Flash coverage: 12.0m
Microphone port: Yes
Interchangeable lenses:
- Nikon has a great set of compatible lenses (~280).
Planned:
- Extension tube set for Nikon (7, 14 and 28mm)**
- Directional microphone w/ windscreen for cameras**
- V-shape triple 3 shoe mount bracket for cameras**
- LED light for cameras**
- Extension tubes = $36
- Var ND 55mm filter = $18
- Mic = $27
- Mount bracket = $11
- Light = $37
- 58mm CPL (kit) = $15
The DX lens focal lengths are not equivalent to 35mm with respect to image size. To calculate the image size, "convert" the focal length multiplying it by 1.5x (crop factor).
Extension tubes are a cheap way to increase lens' focal lengths (and enabling macro photography, increasing Bokeh). But remember: no infinite focusing with extension tubes!
The lower the ISO, the sharper (nicer) the image is, as well as longer is the exposure time.
Black & White mode reduces the noise of the images. This is very useful when shooting in dark places with high ISO.
The smaller is the aperture (or higher is f/#), the more of the depth of field is in focus and longer the exposure time is.
To have the "creamy" effect on long exposures of water and/or clouds, it is needed and exposure of least 15 secs. For than, one must use a ND (Neutral Density) filter (ND8 or darker).
A series of images is a much smarter way to do the "creamy" effect, than density filters. The mediam filter also is capable of removing moving objects of an image. You can do it either with individual images combined later in a photo editor software, either using the "Multiple exposure" mode from your camera.
"Shaking hands" should not be a problem on shutter speeds faster than 1/100 sec (1/60 sec). On the other side, if one have a very steady hand, it is possible to shoot at 1/40 sec or even 1/30 sec.
To increase Bokeh (or decrease the Depth of Focus):
- Small f-number (or f-stop; f/2.8 or faster);
- Short object distance (check lens minimum focus distance);
- Long focal length (50mm or longer).
DSLRs largely replaced film-based SLRs during the 2000s, and despite the rising popularity of mirrorless system cameras in the early 2010s, DSLRs remain the most common type of interchangeable lens camera in use as of late 2018.
However, this trend shall change in the 2020's as mirrorless camera are gaining popularity. This is clear with the recent (2018) announcements of great products from three major camera manufacturers, namely Nikon, Canon and Sony.
In early 2018, Sony announced the A7III mirrorless camera, bringing the 693 auto-focus points of the A9 model at a much lower cost. In August 2018, Nikon announced its new full-frame mirrorless Z6 and Z7 cameras, both using a new lens mount. Canon announced its first full-frame mirrorless model, the EOS R, and its own new lens mount in October 2018.
In Jan 2019 I had a budget of USD~800 and I decided to buy a (Nikon) DSLR instead of a (Sony) mirrorless camera. The main reason for this choice was that mirrorless cameras are more expensive at this moment. The DSLR choice allowed me to buy a kit of different lenses (although my budget also excluded Canon DLSRs).
I believe my start was an ideal one. I bought a decent body (Nikon D5300, USD~400) which contains many important features for me (including a fully articulated screen for selfies and time-lapse control) with 3 lenses to cover multiple applications. Here are the lenses selection:
- Standard zoom lens 27-83mm f/3.5-5.6, for landscape and portraits (USD~100);
- Telephoto lens 105-450mm f/4.5-6.3, for nature and close-up (USD~150);
- Normal lens ~50mm f/1.8, for night sky and low-light environments (USD~200).
See "my gear" for more details.
Unless you need to photograph under severe weather conditions, or have substantion amount of money to spend, it is not so useful to make and investiment on a weather sealed body camera. To have full protection, you would also need to buy sealed lenses, which are extremely high cost.